Article

The Three Pillars of Leadership: Unlocking the Secret to Organizational Success

September 3, 2024
Three Pillars of Leadership image

In business, success is a complex puzzle, and the most significant pieces are not just financial acumen or market opportunities—they are the leaders at the helm. I’ve spent decades dissecting what makes some leaders soar while others crash and burn. My research has revealed a one important conclusion: effective leadership is built on three fundamental pillars—The Visionary Evangelist, The Relationship Builder, and The Manager of Execution. These pillars are not just styles but skill sets that are the very lifeblood of an organization. If you want to understand why some companies thrive and others fade into obscurity, look no further.
The Visionary Evangelist: The Dreamer Who Dares Where there is no vision, the people perish—or at least, the company does. The Visionary Evangelist is the leader who sees the world not as it is, but as it could be. These are the Steve Jobs, Elon Musks, and Thomas Edisons of the world—people who, from the outside, seem to have been born with a prophetic ability to foresee the future. They don’t just think outside the box; they burn the box to ashes and build something entirely new.
Strengths:
The brilliance of a Visionary Evangelist lies in their unshakable belief in the impossible. They are the ones who can turn a seemingly absurd idea into a billion-dollar enterprise. Visionary Evangelists possess a magnetic charisma that draws people in and a relentless drive that pushes them to pursue their dreams no matter the obstacles. Their creativity is boundless, their energy infectious, and their ability to rally a team around a common goal is nothing short of miraculous.

Weaknesses:
But here’s the catch—Visionary Evangelists are often their own worst enemies. Their genius comes with a dark side. They are notoriously terrible at the mundane but crucial aspects of running a business. Details? Boring. Processes? Stifling. Execution? Someone else’s problem. This is why so many startups led by visionary founders stumble when it’s time to scale. They are brilliant at sparking the flame but terrible at keeping the fire burning. Their lack of focus on execution can turn a promising venture into a chaotic mess. In short, Visionary Evangelists can light up the world with their ideas, but without a solid team to catch and contain that lightning, they’re likely to burn the house down.

The Relationship Builder: The Glue That Binds In the cutthroat world of business today, where competition is fierce and the stakes are high, it’s easy to forget that companies are not just collections of assets—they are communities of people. Enter the Relationship Builder, the leader who understands that the strength of any organization lies in the bonds between its members. These leaders are the unsung heroes, the empathetic souls who quietly keep the ship sailing smoothly by ensuring that everyone feels valued and heard.
Strengths:
Relationship Builders are the emotional glue of any organization. They are the ones who know every employee’s birthday, who can defuse a tense meeting with a well-timed joke, and who instinctively understand what makes each team member tick. In a world increasingly dominated by remote work and digital communication, these leaders are more vital than ever. They are the ones who create a culture of trust and collaboration, who make people want to come to work every day, even when the work itself is challenging.

But don’t be fooled by their soft touch—Relationship Builders have a powerful impact. They are the reason people stay with a company through tough times, the ones who turn a group of employees into a true team. They are the heart and soul of an organization, ensuring that the people who make up the company are connected, motivated, and ready to go the extra mile.
For example, think about Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, who transformed the company’s culture by emphasizing empathy, collaboration, and a growth mindset. Under his leadership, Microsoft has shifted from a cutthroat, competitive environment to one where teamwork and inclusivity are prioritized, leading to significant business success. Another great example of a Relationship Builder is Tony Hsieh, the late CEO of Zappos. Hsieh was known for his extraordinary emphasis on company culture and employee happiness, which he believed were key to the success of the business. His leadership style was built on trust, open communication, and fostering strong relationships within the organization
Weaknesses:
However, the very traits that make Relationship Builders so effective can also be their downfall. Their deep empathy and desire to avoid conflict can make them indecisive and overly accommodating. They may struggle with holding people accountable, fearing that tough love might damage relationships. In the pressure cooker of startup life, this can lead to a lack of discipline and accountability that undermines the entire organization. They can be so focused on keeping everyone happy that they lose sight of the bigger picture, becoming reluctant to make the hard decisions that leadership sometimes demands. In short, they can be too nice for their own good.

The Manager of Execution: The No-Nonsense Operator If Visionary Evangelists are the spark and Relationship Builders the glue, then Managers of Execution are the gears that keep the machine running. They are the pragmatic, detail-oriented leaders who take the grand ideas of the Visionary Evangelist and turn them into reality. These are the unsung warriors of the business world—the ones who ensure that the trains run on time, that budgets are met, and that projects are delivered with precision.
Think about Mary Barra, CEO of General Motors, as an example. Barra’s focus on execution and operational excellence has driven GM through a significant transformation, including the aggressive push towards electric vehicles. Her disciplined approach has helped GM stay competitive in an industry undergoing rapid change. Another modern example is Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, who succeeded Steve Jobs. While Jobs was the quintessential Visionary Evangelist, Cook is the epitome of a Manager of Execution. His meticulous attention to supply chain management and operational efficiency has allowed Apple to maintain its status as one of the most valuable companies in the world, even after the passing of its iconic founder
Strengths:
Managers of Execution are the backbone of any successful organization. They bring order to chaos, discipline to creativity, and focus to ambition. They are the ones who see the world in terms of processes, plans, and measurable outcomes. They are relentless in their pursuit of efficiency and are not afraid to make the tough decisions necessary to keep the organization on track. Their greatest strength is their ability to take a high-level vision and break it down into actionable steps that can be executed with military precision.

In the startup world, where the chaos of rapid growth can easily overwhelm even the best ideas, Managers of Execution are the ones who keep the ship from capsizing. They are the ones who ensure that deadlines are met, that resources are allocated efficiently, and that the organization remains financially viable. Without them, even the most brilliant startup is doomed to flounder.
Weaknesses:
But like the other pillars, Managers of Execution have their Achilles’ heel. Their focus on efficiency and control can lead them to become micromanagers, stifling creativity and innovation in their quest for order. They may become so obsessed with process that they lose sight of the ultimate goal, turning into bureaucrats rather than leaders. Their insistence on following the plan can make them inflexible and resistant to change, which is deadly in a fast-paced, dynamic environment. Moreover, their tendency to prioritize tasks over people can lead to a toxic work environment where employees feel like cogs in a machine rather than valued members of a team.

Why All Three Pillars Matter Here’s the ultimate my 40 years of research has uncovered: no single pillar is enough. The Visionary Evangelist, the Relationship Builder, and the Manager of Execution are all essential to the success of any organization, but each brings unique strengths and corresponding weaknesses. An organization led solely by a Visionary Evangelist may blaze bright but burn out quickly, undone by its inability to execute. A company dominated by Relationship Builders may be a great place to work but could falter without a clear vision or the discipline to deliver results. And a firm run by Managers of Execution may be efficient but soulless, marching toward mediocrity rather than greatness.
This is why the most successful organizations are those that cultivate all three pillars. It’s about balance. A great company needs the visionary spark to inspire, the relational glue to bind, and the operational rigor to execute. Each pillar supports the others, compensating for their weaknesses and amplifying their strengths.
The Founder’s Dilemma For founders, this balance is particularly crucial—and particularly challenging. Founders often excel as Visionary Evangelists, brimming with ideas and passion. But as their companies grow, the skills that made them successful in the early days—creativity, risk-taking, relentless energy—can become liabilities. Without the execution skills to scale operations or the relational skills to build a cohesive team, even the most brilliant founders can find themselves at the helm of a sinking ship.
This is why many startups struggle to transition from a scrappy, innovative startup to a sustainable, growing company. Founders must either develop the other pillars or, more realistically, bring in leaders who can complement their strengths. The best founders are those who recognize their limitations and surround themselves with a team that can fill in the gaps.
Leadership in Larger Organizations As companies grow, the need for leaders who embody all three pillars becomes even more critical. In a large organization, it’s not enough to be a visionary or a people person or an operational expert—you need to be all three, or at least understand how to lead a team that covers all these bases. Leaders who can only see through the lens of one pillar are doomed to fail in the complex, multifaceted world of big business.
The best leaders are those who can switch between these styles as the situation demands, who can dream big, connect deeply with their team, and deliver results—all at the same time. It’s a tall order, but those who can master this trifecta are the ones who leave a lasting legacy.
The Path to Lasting Success The Three Pillars of Leadership offer a roadmap for building a successful organization, but they also serve as a warning. Lean too heavily on any one pillar, and your organization may crumble. The real power lies in balance—in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each leadership style and ensuring that your team has all three pillars represented. For founders and leaders alike, the message is clear: embrace your strengths, but don’t ignore your weaknesses. Surround yourself with people who can do what you can’t, and you’ll build an organization that’s not just successful but unstoppable. In the end, it’s not just about being a visionary, a connector, or an operator—it’s about being all of them, or knowing how to lead a team that is.

share this

Related Articles

Related Articles

Why Successful Founders Win—and Others Crash and Burn
By Rich Hagberg June 9, 2025
Startup founders represent the ultimate paradox: celebrated for their innovative brilliance yet notoriously susceptible to failure. In reality, the difference between astronomical success and dismal failure boils down to a surprisingly consistent set of behaviors and personality traits. Drawing from extensive 360 feedback studies, personality assessments, and deep insights from Founders Keepers, we've unraveled exactly what separates winners from losers in the startup world. Myth-busting: Genius Jerks Rarely Prevail A common myth persists that successful founders must be narcissistic, domineering, and abrasive—the stereotypical "genius jerk." Yet, our rigorous analysis of data from 122 founders, comparing the top performers (at least 10X returns) with bottom performers (zero returns), decisively shatters this myth. Successful founders, contrary to popular belief, rarely succeed because of egocentric ruthlessness. Instead, they thrive due to their extraordinary adaptability, relationship-building skills, disciplined execution, and deep personal grounding. Meanwhile, unsuccessful founders often implode because of their rigidity, isolation, impulsivity, and inability to truly lead teams. Adaptability: The Endless Pursuit of Product-Market Fit Successful founders understand one critical truth: product-market fit isn't a finish line; it’s a continuous process. They show an exceptional ability to: Remain open to input, eagerly soliciting and integrating team feedback. Effectively manage resistance, empathetically addressing team concerns. Skillfully create buy-in, building commitment through transparency and genuine engagement. In contrast, unsuccessful founders typically fail due to rigidity. They stubbornly anchor themselves to outdated strategies, ignore valuable feedback, and react defensively to challenges, eventually becoming roadblocks in their own companies. Relationship Building: From Loners to Leaders A pivotal distinction lies in the ability to work effectively through others. Successful founders consistently excel in empowering their teams. They: Delegate effectively, granting autonomy while clearly defining expectations. Maintain trust through consistent behavior, integrity, and transparency. Develop robust emotional intelligence, adeptly managing conflict and strengthening team cohesion. Unsuccessful founders, on the other hand, struggle profoundly with delegation. Their chronic micromanagement erodes trust and morale, creating environments of fear and resentment. They often isolate themselves, failing to build genuine relationships, thus missing critical insights and innovations their teams could provide. Execution: Discipline Over Charisma Execution—arguably the most underrated pillar of startup leadership—truly separates winners from losers. Successful founders meticulously: Set clear, measurable, and achievable goals. Follow through relentlessly, holding themselves and others accountable. Create robust systems and processes to scale effectively. Conversely, unsuccessful founders typically suffer from chronic disorganization and impulsivity. Their inability to prioritize, constant pivots without strategic clarity, and poor follow-through generate chaos and stifle growth. Personal Grounding: Stability Amidst Chaos Perhaps most counterintuitively, successful founders exhibit deep personal grounding—a trait seldom highlighted in sensational startup narratives. They: Demonstrate emotional resilience, remaining composed under extreme stress. Exhibit patience, tolerating ambiguity and uncertainty with grace. Maintain optimistic yet realistic perspectives, avoiding destructive cycles of anxiety or panic. Unsuccessful founders, however, often spiral under pressure. Their volatility and emotional reactivity exacerbate crises, leading to poor decision-making and destructive interpersonal dynamics. Self-Awareness: The Hidden Driver of Success Underpinning all these traits is profound self-awareness—arguably the most critical competency of all. Successful founders consistently seek self-improvement, humbly recognizing their weaknesses and proactively addressing them. They actively solicit honest feedback, never fearing the vulnerability required for growth. Unsuccessful founders, conversely, often display a tragic lack of self-awareness. Their denial of shortcomings, defensiveness to feedback, and unwillingness to evolve ultimately doom their startups. Real-World Wisdom: Voices from the Trenches Beyond the data, the human stories captured in 360 feedback illustrate these differences vividly: Successful founders receive praise like, “He constantly solicits input, adapts swiftly, and builds deep trust. His humility makes everyone want to follow him.” Unsuccessful founders, by contrast, earn harsh critiques: “He ignores input, reacts defensively, and insists on controlling every detail. The team is disengaged and demoralized.” These narratives underscore the simple but powerful truth that the best founders aren't isolated geniuses—they’re skilled leaders who build environments where everyone can thrive. The Path Forward: Turning Insights into Action If you're a founder, investor, or leader within the startup ecosystem, confront these truths head-on. Assess yourself and your organization rigorously: Are you truly adaptable, or merely superficially agile? Are you empowering your team, or stifling their potential? Are you executing with discipline, or flailing with chaos? Are you grounded emotionally, or reactive and volatile? Are you genuinely self-aware, or defensively delusional? Final Thoughts Ultimately, founder success isn’t about flashy charisma or ruthless ambition. It’s about a disciplined commitment to growth—both personal and organizational. Embrace adaptability, deepen your self-awareness, and master the art of leadership grounded in trust and integrity. This is not merely good advice—it’s the proven difference between a startup’s spectacular success and its avoidable failure.  What traits do you see defining successful and unsuccessful founders in your experience? Let's discuss!
Why Do So Many Founders Cross Ethical Lines? A Guide for Investors
By Rich Hagberg May 9, 2025
We’ve all seen the headlines: visionary founders, celebrated one day, indicted for fraud the next. Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos, Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX, Trevor Milton of Nikola—each a cautionary tale. But why does this keep happening? More importantly, how can investors and venture capitalists spot the red flags before disaster strikes? After decades coaching startup founders and executives, and through intensive psychological profiling research in my book, Founders Keepers, it’s clear that the qualities which make founders extraordinary can also lead them into ethical peril. Ambition Gone Rogue Ambition is the engine of innovation, but when unchecked, it can spiral into something destructive. Elizabeth Holmes, once hailed as the next Steve Jobs, turned ambition into deception, sacrificing integrity for the illusion of success. Her willingness to misrepresent Theranos's technology eventually led to fraud convictions and a 11-year prison sentence. Similarly, Trevor Milton fabricated demonstrations of Nikola’s hydrogen-powered trucks, deceiving investors and regulators alike. Ambition that isn’t tempered by reality becomes toxic, pushing founders to prioritize appearances over substance. Narcissism and the Cult of Personality A striking number of fraudulent founders exhibit narcissistic traits. Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is disturbingly common among indicted entrepreneurs like Holmes, Adam Neumann, and Billy McFarland. These individuals have inflated self-worth, entitlement, and a troubling lack of empathy—traits that enable them to manipulate investors, employees, and markets. Adam Neumann’s charismatic leadership at WeWork masked a self-serving agenda. He leased his own properties to WeWork and indulged in extravagances funded by investor capital. His eventual downfall underscores a critical point: charisma and confidence, unchecked by accountability, can devastate companies. Pressure, Risk, and Rationalization Founders operate in pressure cookers. Investor demands, market competition, and internal expectations can distort ethical boundaries. Under such strain, founders rationalize questionable decisions—initially minor, then increasingly severe. Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX saga exemplifies this slippery slope. Praised for his effective altruism, he secretly diverted customer funds into his own hedge fund, creating one of history’s largest financial implosions. Under extreme pressure to perform, ethical lines blurred into oblivion. The Dark Triad and Founder Psychology Research identifies a psychological pattern—the Dark Triad: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Founders exhibiting these traits manipulate, charm, and dominate others effortlessly. Their moral compasses malfunction, viewing ethics as mere obstacles. Martin Shkreli of Turing Pharmaceuticals raised drug prices mercilessly, justified as smart business. He ultimately faced securities fraud charges. This combination of manipulative charm, moral disengagement, and ruthless pragmatism frequently ends in corporate ruin. Red Flags Investors Can’t Ignore VCs and investors must vigilantly recognize signals of potential ethical crises: Accountability Gaps: Founders who deflect blame, resist feedback, or evade responsibility when faced with failures. Deceptive Fluency: Founders who remain intentionally vague, changing narratives to fit different audiences, lack transparency, and dodge specifics. Weak Governance: Companies lacking robust financial controls, passive boards, or weak compliance protocols enable founder misconduct. Excessive Charm: Overly charismatic leaders who evade scrutiny, foster cult-like devotion, and dismiss ethical concerns as trivial. Case Study: When Good Intentions Go Bad Consider Charlie Javice the Frank founder. Desperate to sell her startup, she fabricated millions of fake users, deceiving JPMorgan into a $175 million acquisition. Ambition, pressure, and opportunity collided disastrously, underscoring that even well-intentioned founders can fall if ethical vigilance wanes. Prevention through Awareness and Systems To mitigate these risks, investors must foster cultures of accountability. This means: Rigorous Due Diligence: Deep vetting of founder histories, not just their pitch decks. Transparent Governance: Enforcing independent oversight, clear reporting, and stringent ethical guidelines. Balanced Teams: Encouraging founders to build leadership teams empowered to challenge decisions. Healthy skepticism, combined with robust systems, creates a strong firewall against unethical behavior. Redemption and Self-Awareness Not all troubled founders are irredeemable. Many need interventions—coaching, accountability partners, and structured feedback—to prevent ethical slippage. Self-awareness is key. Founders who reflect on their blind spots and acknowledge limitations have a far better prognosis. Investing Wisely Means Looking Deeper The stark truth for investors is this: brilliance without integrity is dangerous. Investing isn't merely betting on ideas; it's assessing character. The cost of ignoring red flags is staggering, not just financially, but reputationally and ethically. Ask yourself one simple question when evaluating founders: If they weren't successful, would their behaviors still seem acceptable? The answer reveals everything. The line between visionary and fraudster is thin. Vigilance, skepticism, and structured accountability are critical tools in protecting your investments—and ensuring the next headline isn't about your portfolio. 
A painting of a man in a lotus position with a plane in the background.
By Richard Fagan February 27, 2025
Founders live in a world of chaos. It’s exhilarating, intense, and downright terrifying. You’re constantly shifting between the thrill of new ideas and the crushing weight of responsibility. Every decision feels like a life-or-death moment for your company, and the stress is unrelenting. Yet, amid this madness, there’s one thing that determines whether you’ll thrive or crash and burn: personal grounding.
ALL ARTICLES

STAY UP TO DATE

GET PATH'S LATEST

Receive bi-weekly updates from the church, and get a heads up on upcoming events.

Contact Us

A close up of a man wearing a beanie and a grey shirt
A black and white logo that says `` beloved believe ''
A woman is sitting on the ground playing a guitar.